US commander's advice to Obama: Boost the effort in Afghanistanor pull out of it
The article is by by Simon Tisdall on Sep 23, 2009

In all, decisions made in the White House communicates pretty much through a Linear Model to the US citizens and the whole world.
General Stanley McChrystal had made a breakthrough by "speaking truth to power", making the communication between the White House and the US military in Afghanistan somewhat an interactive one.
We know that problem will arise when people communicate to us differently. General McChrystal did not delibrately make his speech tactful. It was direct to the point. In this case, the world media is highly focused on the type of move President Obama will make.
President Obama is still in his early terms of presidency and the weight of the world lies on his shoulders. He may be eager to prove himself, but war is always a delicate issue to tackle. By sending more troops to Afghan, many more lives would be sacrificed. It would also contradict his promises to the Americans.

However, if the number of troops are not increased, boys sent to fight in Afghan will continue to be sent home in body bags.
Faced with such dilemma, what can Obama do to balance the scale?
While the war drags on, it takes a toll on US's resources. Afghan no doubt will suffer their own heavy share of war casualities, many of them innocent civilians. Does it weigh heavy on Obama, the countless souls that will be lost if the war drags on? Even though he was not the one who declared war.